Recording of diagnoses in public primary oral health care in a retrospective longitudinal observational study in a Finnish town: Underrepresentation of periodontitis diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates which oral diagnoses public primary dental care dentists record. METHODS: An observational register-based retrospective follow-up study was performed in the public primary oral health care of a Finnish town after the dentists were advised to mark the diagnoses in their practices. The rate of recorded diagnoses resulting from visits to the public primary care dentists was studied. The assessed diagnoses were recorded with the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. The distribution of diagnoses was recorded during a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The most frequent diagnosis groups were dental caries (K02, 38.6%), other diseases of dental hard tissues (K03, 14.9%), diseases of pulp and periapical tissues (K04, 11.4%), periodontal diseases (K05, 9.7%), and different types of bone fractures (S02, 8.1%). Periodontitis was underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: In public primary oral health care, there may be difficulties in adequate recording of certain chronic diseases.

Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the detectability of the intra-oral photographic method in comparison to the baseline, comprehensive dental examination (CDE), in children when performed by different levels of dental practitioners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a quality assurance program, intra-oral photographs were obtained from 77 patients (2-18 years) as part of a CDE before undertaking dental treatment under general anaesthesia. A DSLR camera was utilised to acquire images which were subsequently uploaded to a cloud-based server. The baseline for each participant was established during the CDE, utilising both visual and radiographic examination, which was then compared to the assessment made by a mid-level dental practitioners (MLDP). The evaluation was based on utilising an odontogram where the teeth were charted either as decayed or filled. RESULTS: Specificity (95%) was higher than sensitivity (61.5%) when comparing the photographic assessment with the benchmark CDE assessment. The inter-rater reliability between the two methods of assessment was substantial, with a kappa score of 0.62. The photographic assessment method underestimated the decayed and filled teeth, as observed by the caries experience (dft/DFT scores) (CDE = 7.01 vs. photographic assessment = 5.22). There were lower levels of diagnostic detection in the posterior teeth as compared to the anterior teeth assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Although the CDE is still considered to be the gold-standard, this study found that the photographic caries assessment by MLDP produced an acceptable diagnostic level of detection particularly for the anterior teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The photographic method could offer a potential cost-saving and user-friendly screening.

A Systematic Review on the Validity of Teledentistry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the validity of using teledentistry in oral care examination and diagnosis. METHODS: In June 2016, a systematic search of the literature was conducted without time restrictions in three electronic databases (Ebscohost, Pubmed, and Scopus). Two reviewers screened the retrieved articles first by title and then by abstract to determine relevant articles for full text review. Studies included were as follows: (1) related to teledentistry, (2) available in full text and English, (3) compared teledentistry application to a gold standard, and (4) provided clear statistical tests for validity. The methodological quality of studies was determined using the "Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS)." RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies met the initial search criteria. Following removal of duplicate articles, only 58 were remaining and reviewed by title and abstract, yielding 14 full-text articles. Nine of the full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Results of the QUADAS assessment varied from 9 to 13 out of 14 items; therefore, studies demonstrated high quality (>60%). Validity of teledentistry varied and is reported by range for the following statistics: sensitivity (n = 8, 25-100%), specificity (n = 7, 68-100%), positive predictive value (n = 5, 57-100%), and negative predictive value (n = 5, 50-100%). Kappa statistics were also reported for evaluation of reliability between gold standard and teledentistry examination (n = 6, 46-93%). CONCLUSIONS: Teledentistry could be comparable to face-to-face for oral screening, especially in school-based programs, rural areas and areas with limited access to care, and long-term care facilities. Identification of oral diseases, referrals, and teleconsultations are possible and valid. The need for methodologically designed studies with appropriate statistical tests to determine the validity of teledentistry exists.

Development of an Oral Assessment Sheet for Evaluating Older Adults in Nursing Homes.

A new general use oral assessment sheet (OAS), comprising three items each in three categories (i.e., oral hygiene, biting and chewing, and oral function), was developed to improve the oral health of older adults requiring nursing care. Seventy-nine care workers used the assessment sheet to evaluate oral conditions in 188 institutionalized older adults. Forty-five care workers and three dental professionals then assessed oral conditions in 45 institutionalized older adults using the test-retest method before and after dental professional guidance. Cronbach's alpha of the OAS was 0.72, and 0.65, 0.57, and 0.82 for the three subcategories of oral hygiene, biting and chewing, and oral function, respectively. After dental professional intervention, absolute and relative agreement coefficients increased to more than 0.6 and 0.89, respectively. Reliability and validity of the OAS were verified, and difficulties in oral assessment experienced by care workers were identified. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017; 10(5):234-239.].

Dental Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosis-Driven Dentistry: Strategies to Enhance Adoption of Dental Diagnostic Terminology.

The routine use of standardized diagnostic terminologies (DxTMs) in dentistry has long been the subject of academic debate. This paper discusses the strategies suggested by a group of dental stakeholders to enhance the uptake of DxTMs. Through unstructured interviewing at the 'Toward a Diagnosis-Driven Profession' National Conference held on 19 March 2016 in Los Angeles, CA, USA participants were asked how enthusiastic they were about implementing and consistently using DxTMs at their work. They also brainstormed on strategies to improve the widespread use of DxTMs. Their responses are summarized by recursive abstraction and presented in themes. Conference participants were very enthusiastic about using a DxTM in their place of work. Participants enumerated several strategies to make DxTMs more appealing including: the use of mandates, a value proposition for providers, communication and education, and integration with EHRs and existing systems. All groups across the dental healthcare delivery spectrum will need to work together for the success of the widespread and consistent use of DxTMs. Understanding the provider perspective is however the most critical step in achieving this goal, as they are the group who will ultimately be saddled with the critical task of ensuring DxTM use at the point of care.

Initial Validity Analysis of the American Board of Emergency Medicine Enhanced Oral Examination.

OBJECTIVES: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) has introduced a new testing format for the oral certification examination (OCE): the enhanced oral or "eOral" format. The purpose of this study was to perform initial validity analyses of the eOral format. The two hypotheses were: 1) the case content in the eOral format was sufficiently similar to clinical practice and 2) the eOral case materials were sufficiently similar to clinical practice. The eOral and traditional formats were compared for these characteristics. METHODS: This was a prospective survey study. The survey was administered as a voluntary postexamination activity at the end of the 2015 spring (April 25-27) and fall (October 10-13) ABEM OCEs. The survey is a routine part of the ABEM oral examination experience. For 2015, two additional questions were added to gauge the similarity of the eOral format to clinical practice. Validity was defined by content and substantive elements within Messick's model of construct validity as well as portions of Kane's validity model. RESULTS: Of the 1,746 physicians who took the oral examination, 1,380 physicians (79.0%) completed all or part of the study survey questions. The majority of respondents agreed the patient presentations in the cases were similar (strongly agreed or agreed) to cases seen in clinical practice, in both the traditional cases (95.1%) and the eOral cases (90.1%). Likewise, the majority of respondents answered that the case materials (e.g., laboratory, radiographs) were similar (strongly agreed or agreed) to what they encounter in clinical practice, both in the traditional format (85.8%) and in the eOral cases (93.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Most emergency physicians reported that the types of cases tested in the traditional and eOral formats were similar to cases encountered in clinical practice. In addition, most physicians found the case materials to be similar to what is seen in clinical practice. This study provides early validity evidence for the eOral format.

Clinical and technical considerations in the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid.

Despite the technical challenges involved when collecting, processing and analyzing gingival crevicular fluid samples, research using gingival crevicular fluid has, and will continue to play, a fundamental role in expanding our understanding of periodontal pathogenesis and healing outcomes following treatment. A review of the literature, however, clearly demonstrates that there is considerable variation in the methods used for collection, processing and analysis of gingival crevicular fluid samples by different research groups around the world. Inconsistent or inadequate reporting impairs interpretation of results, prevents accurate comparison of data between studies and potentially limits the conclusions that can be made from a larger body of evidence. The precise methods used for collection and analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (including calibration studies required before definitive clinical studies) should be reported in detail, either in the methods section of published papers or as an online supplementary file, so that other researchers may reproduce the methodology. Only with clear and transparent reporting will the full impact of future gingival crevicular fluid research be realized. This paper discusses the complexities of gingival crevicular fluid collection and analysis and provides guidance to researchers working in this field.

Evaluating a Web-Based Educational Module on Oral Cancer Examination Based on a Behavioral Framework.

Patients at risk of developing oral and/or oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are more likely to see primary care providers (PCPs) than a dentist. Many PCPs do not regularly perform oral cancer examination (OCE). The purpose of this study was to design a web-based educational program based on a behavioral framework to encourage PCPs to conduct OCE. PCPs were solicited to provide feedback on the program and to evaluate their short-term knowledge. The integrated behavioral model was used to design the program. Fifteen PCPs (five in each group: physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) reviewed the program and took a posttest: (1) index of knowledge of risk factors for oral cancer (RiskOC) and (2) index of knowledge of diagnostic procedures for oral cancer (DiagOC). Findings from the process evaluation were mainly positive, with comments on the length of the program comprising the ten negative comments. No significant difference among groups of PCPs (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners) was detected for DiagOC (p = 0.43) or RiskOC (p = 0.201). A program on OPC for PCPs should be less than 40 min. Postviewing knowledge outcomes were similar for all PCPs. The web-based program on OPC based on a behavioral framework could have similar short-term knowledge outcomes for all PCPs and may increase the number of PCPs performing OCEs.

Audit of accuracy of clinical coding in oral surgery.

We aimed to study the accuracy of clinical coding within oral surgery and to identify ways in which it can be improved. We undertook did a multidisciplinary audit of a sample of 646 day case patients who had had oral surgery procedures between 2011 and 2012. We compared the codes given with their case notes and amended any discrepancies. The accuracy of coding was assessed for primary and secondary diagnoses and procedures, and for health resource groupings (HRGs). The financial impact of coding Subjectivity, Variability and Error (SVE) was assessed by reference to national tariffs. The audit resulted in 122 (19%) changes to primary diagnoses. The codes for primary procedures changed in 224 (35%) cases; 310 (48%) morbidities and complications had been missed, and 266 (41%) secondary procedures had been missed or were incorrect. This led to at least one change of coding in 496 (77%) patients, and to the HRG changes in 348 (54%) patients. The financial impact of this was £114 in lost revenue per patient. There is a high incidence of coding errors in oral surgery because of the large number of day cases, a lack of awareness by clinicians of coding issues, and because clinical coders are not always familiar with the large number of highly specialised abbreviations used. Accuracy of coding can be improved through the use of a well-designed proforma, and standards can be maintained by the use of an ongoing data quality assurance programme.

Saliva and biofilm-based diagnostics: a critical review of the literature concerning sialochemistry.

UNLABELLED: There is some evidence to support the use of salivary diagnostics in dentistry. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of saliva as a diagnostic fluid has the potential to shape the role of oral health care professionals in the health care system. While more than a handful of chairside diagnostic tests are available for use by private practitioners, the evidence supporting their use continues to emerge. METHODS: An electronic search of the literature indexed on the PubMed electronic database was conducted to identify human clinical trials utilizing commercially available salivary diagnostics. Papers meeting the inclusion criteria, and any applicable references were critically appraised following SORT guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: While the literature concerning salivary analysis is continuously growing, the limited literature that is available doesn't focus on patient oriented health outcomes. This 'infant' literature is focused on validating metrics and identifying biomarkers with diagnostic potential. As such, the evidence level of the literature is graded as level 3. Despite the lower grade, the research in this area shows consistent results, coherent conclusions, and research identifying new biomarkers will provide additional dimensions to salivary diagnostics.

Do health provider-patient relationships matter? Exploring dentist-patient relationships and oral health-related quality of life in older people.

BACKGROUND: patient experience is now a key parameter in health care. Yet, very little is known about the possible impact of dentist-patient relationships on patient-centred outcomes including older peoples' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). OBJECTIVE: this study assessed the relationship between OHRQoL and dentist-patient relationships related to perceived unmet dental needs; shared decision-making; time spent discussing oral health problems; respect and confidence and trust. PARTICIPANTS: older people aged 65 years and over living in East London, U.K. in 2011. METHODS: a cross-sectional study using stratified random sampling recruited a representative sample of older people (n = 772). PARTICIPANTS completed an oral examination and a structured questionnaire including the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) measuring OHRQoL and five dentist-patient relationship questions taken from the U.K. 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey. Multivariate Poisson regressions modelled the association between OHRQoL and dentist-patient factors adjusting for socio-demographic factors, clinical oral indicators, and dental attendance. RESULTS: having a perceived unmet need for dental treatment (PRR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.32, 2.56) and expressing a lack of trust and confidence in one's dentist (PRR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.98) were significant predictors of poor OHRQoL among older people. CONCLUSIONS: these findings suggest that older people with unmet dental needs and those who expressed a lack of trust and confidence in their dentist were more likely to experience poor OHRQoL reinforcing the importance of the dental patient experience in healthy ageing and well-being.

The gold standard of dental care for the adult performance horse.

This article discusses the primary odontogenic problems of the mature performance horse, including wolf teeth; hooks; overbite, overjet, underjet, and wry bite; equine odontoclastic tooth resorption and hypercementosis; infundibular caries; and secondary oral problems. It outlines the author's methods of taking the history, oral examination, and use of diagnostic nerve blocks.